Starcraft

Navigation: Home - Users - Ahzz

The following are documents submitted by this user:

#	Document	Channel
1	Ahzz (p) vs freaky[light] (z)	Replays
2	Ahzz (P) vs Lyra.Jung (Z)	Replays
3	Ahzz (P) vs Possessed (Z)	Replays
4	Ahzz (Z) vs akasia[about] (T)	Replays
5	Ahzz (Z) vs cloudnyang(T) comeback	Replays
6	Ahzz (Z) vs GsF(P)	Replays
7	Ahzz (Z) vs Heaven (P)	Replays
8	Ahzz 43 min PvZ	Replays
9	Ahzz vs 7 computers!	Replays
10	Ahzz ZvT miuta micro!	Replays
11	Unusual TvP	Replays

The following are comments posted by this user:

#1. Posted on May 08, 2008 10:37 AM. there are a gazillion players like this, discovering one helps nothing. Besides, I'd expect this hacker to swap accounts within a few months anyway. ... Click here to view this comment.

#2. Posted on May 07, 2008 11:57 AM. TheCritic is correct. Winrar is one option that anyone can use. some people may be using some other software instead, such as pkzip or winace etc. ... Click here to view this comment.

#3. Posted on April 26, 2008 10:54 AM. cmalberg, most of the stuff you said is wrong and I'm surprised because if you've seen recent zvt games you will notice how much they really use plague ... Click here to view this comment.

#4. Posted on April 24, 2008 09:35 PM. I have no idea what that had to do to with anything. They played on a ladder, all of them played DIFFERENT opponents, and different times. For example Draco could have been #1 if he had played 10 more games or so. ... Click here to view this comment.

#5. Posted on April 23, 2008 11:34 AM. replays should be released soon. ... Click here to view this comment.

#6. Posted on April 13, 2008 11:09 AM. Nono AJ, I think he posted that before actually viewing those replays. ... Click here to view this comment.

#7. Posted on April 13, 2008 11:05 AM. ya that was me. At that moment I was sleeping. Usually I don't play west but I got this friend of mine who has mad connections and I'm able to play against semi-pros and such, so I was there. ... Click here to view this comment.

#8. Posted on March 30, 2008 09:38 PM. you have to log in first, then request to the team. And the admins will approve/disapprove you after a while. as for iccup launcher, theres a big 'HERE' on the bottom which might lead you to something eh? ... Click here to view this comment.

#9. Posted on March 27, 2008 12:56 PM. according to aj they work just fine, though they are 3 year old games ... Click here to view this comment.

#10. Posted on March 26, 2008 10:45 AM. they're not rigged. you just suck and refuse to listen to anyone telling you something else ... Click here to view this comment.

#11. Posted on March 23, 2008 03:31 PM. hmh ... Click here to view this comment.

#12. Posted on March 23, 2008 01:44 PM. nice job once again ... Click here to view this comment.

#13. Posted on March 10, 2008 10:44 AM. fixed ... Click here to view this comment.

#14. Posted on February 24, 2008 12:44 PM. nono xerox, these hotkeys are very common and used by just about everyone cuz of their efficiency. A little differences there may be but not much ... Click here to view this comment.

#15. Posted on February 20, 2008 03:28 PM. Excellent strategy. You clearly know what you're talking about. I look forward to seeing more content from you! ... Click here to view this comment.

#16. Posted on February 18, 2008 12:16 AM. yeah the commentator is best one out there. In my opinion that was far from his best shoutcasting, but I think its because he's nervous. He's commentating the best of the best, right there next to them, and even paid for it. Plus there is a massive audience watching him. ... Click here to view this comment.

#17. Posted on February 17, 2008 08:35 AM. this is not WCG... ... Click here to view this comment.

#18. Posted on February 05, 2008 11:49 PM. I play random in 2v2. We got dual terran six to seven times though. Dual races aren't really that much weaker though... At least not in this level. third game vs sc2.hu is missing because the opponent disconnected and didnt come back so we got a walkover. ... Click here to view this comment.

#19. Posted on February 04, 2008 12:24 PM. everyone has to do that. Besides, its not that we mind much ... Click here to view this comment.

#20. Posted on February 04, 2008 11:40 AM. wee ^^ We shall trample over this tournament undefeated! ... Click here to view this comment.

#21. Posted on February 01, 2008 11:30 PM. good. this is exactly what every fastest map player should do; destroy their workers. For protoss, its storm. for zerg, lurkers, for terran, tanks/science vessel irradiate. You even provided an more effective way to blast through their defenses. ... Click here to view this comment.

#22. Posted on February 01, 2008 11:29 PM. Though nukes are mostly useless and its easy to predict where your opponent is nuking, this covers up nuking strategy quite well, thus , it got accepted. This wont work against experts unless its FFA and he's busy doing a lot of stuff ... Click here to view this comment.

#23. Posted on January 25, 2008 07:23 AM. im amazed, I didnt approve this one but you changed the content to the not approved one. well, whatever. It really doesn't work like you say unless you play against an greatly inferior player. the previous one at least had a chance of working ... Click here to view this comment.

#24. Posted on January 24, 2008 10:20 AM. well, I'm not sure if they're especially valuable. Also, this name would be better name for a VOD or a strategy. But not a replay. ... Click here to view this comment.

#25. Posted on January 23, 2008 04:46 AM. there might be times when sc.org gives out spots, such as in our case. Naturally you can apply as well, but its a different thing wether you get accepted or not. ATM I'm not sure if we have much shortage on staff ... Click here to view this comment.

#26. Posted on January 20, 2008 03:34 AM. indeed, this is flawed. The thing is, the goal is not exactly to get fastest possible mutas, its to get faster mutas than your opponent. And they WILL notice your way of playing real soon, and they will beat it too, they'll just make lings, some sunkens, and thats that. When your lings come he will have mutas and its over, you cant beat it then. Though this might work if you hide it well and so on, mainly against less experienced players though ... Click here to view this comment.

#27. Posted on January 19, 2008 03:18 AM. .... please, this replay got over here, like, hour or two ago. chill man, comments and votes dont come and go that easily. wait a day or two and you'll have comments, isntead of whining when they're not here 10 mins after it got approved dont take me wrong, im just saying you should be more patient ... Click here to view this comment.

#28. Posted on January 14, 2008 07:51 AM. guide is good, however wether it works or not is not. But I guess this might be a rather neat rush strategy for less skilled players ... Click here to view this comment.

#29. Posted on January 10, 2008 01:09 PM. might have been lag and you posted it twice, since the posts were made almost the same time, to 'weaken' spam they merged into one post. ... Click here to view this comment.

#30. Posted on January 10, 2008 11:15 AM. you're not part of the sc.org staff for the most important reason. Every comminuty might have one of the best players around the world lurking, but thats not the point and wouldnt really have any idea. It's a fansite tournament, only the staff of each site participate. ... Click here to view this comment.

#31. Posted on January 09, 2008 04:43 AM. I knew that he wasnt, and that's why I didnt make cannons. It's all about scouting and game knowledge. Had he been going for mutas, I would have acted differently. And yeah, I know my zerg is better.. My main matchups are zvt/zvp/pvz... But I only started pvz recently and I have much less experience with it than with other zerg matchups. I just HATE zvz and I hate the luck involved in it, so I changed to pvz, and I've been receiving better results in general. ... Click here to view this comment.

#32. Posted on January 09, 2008 04:41 AM. ah this game is a little bit old, so it wasn't my best. Also, I knew that I had to micro carefully and I'd win, so I didnt mind a little surplus. Additionally in the end I knew I had an enormous lead so I stopped trying 100% but yes, you could say that the resources that kept piling up were a flaw of my gameplay. ... Click here to view this comment.

#33. Posted on January 07, 2008 01:32 PM. yes that is correct. If you micro a bit you will be fine from vulture attacks etc. untill you get obs. But in any case, on those maps 2 gate dragoon is needed before robo ... Click here to view this comment.

#34. Posted on January 03, 2008 04:49 PM. nice ... Click here to view this comment.

#35. Posted on January 03, 2008 04:48 PM. nice strategy. good job ... Click here to view this comment.

#36. Posted on January 01, 2008 07:46 AM. nowadays there are just about none. ... Click here to view this comment.

#37. Posted on December 24, 2007 01:51 AM. do you use the correct version? I admit that the replay may be buggy if its played on battle.net but viewed in single and vice versa, or if its played x16 from the beginning, however, the version may be wrong 1.15.1 is newest ... Click here to view this comment.

#38. Posted on December 21, 2007 03:02 AM. its not like I care but I'm slightly amazed this has got over 1000 downloads in a short while, while people haven't really given much positive feedback either. But whatever ... Click here to view this comment.

#39. Posted on December 21, 2007 03:00 AM. sometimes it happens. I think it might happen if you, for instance, play it at x16. I'm not sure but I think so ... Click here to view this comment.

#40. Posted on December 09, 2007 09:30 AM. it's done. I easily beat kirby. /thread ... Click here to view this comment.

#41. Posted on December 04, 2007 11:01 AM. we're not doing this only for you. ... Click here to view this comment.

#42. Posted on December 04, 2007 10:05 AM. uh what? mind made a huge jump yes, but he's still only #20, cuz this was his first big win n all ... Click here to view this comment.

#43. Posted on December 02, 2007 09:35 PM. yeah kirby, if only you were a site admin all the worries of this site would be gone huh? ... Click here to view this comment.

#44. Posted on December 01, 2007 03:37 AM. and your point being? the other option is that I'd have quit battle.net and that wouldn't have made any difference than what it was now. And now you're using it as an excuse. Wether I idle over the night, or quit battle.net over the night, what difference would it have made? thats correct, none. Since you're trying to be clever, let's put it this way... I've been on a lot, even staying up till 3 am my time. And guess who still hasn't been online? That's correct, who else would it be tha ... Click here to view this comment.

#45. Posted on November 30, 2007 01:02 PM. who are you talking to? ... Click here to view this comment.

#46. Posted on November 30, 2007 04:47 AM. yeah I was sleeping. And guess what times? 1:30 am - 8am my time. However else could I have done it? thats right, no way. And not to mention, sure you make an excuse like that, but you didnt ask me for a game a single time. I checked the logs. Therefore, your excuse isn't working. Try better next time. ... Click here to view this comment.

#47. Posted on November 29, 2007 05:34 AM. ...im just wondering who are you to talk kirby... Srsly, I've proved almost all of your strategies wrong, or at least pointed out their flaws. You also disagree on playing me and you haven't beat a single decent player with these strategies. And no, decent does not mean akar, mustardmap, or matgeo. or even dutch playing terran or whatever. People better than that. ... Click here to view this comment.

#48. Posted on November 22, 2007 08:08 AM. "i put more effort in than he did." in fact, I doubt that. but whatever. , "I have a feeling that Ahzz just denounced some of those strats because he was on a roll. All strats have flaws." I said that 'this might work' on some strats. otherwise not really. If I didn't crush a strategy completely(when it wasnt utter nonsense), I pointed out its flaws. ... Click here to view this comment.

#49. Posted on November 17, 2007 03:42 AM. because they dont retard. Boxer/nada have used workers AND marines, aka something little called extra offensive bunker rush hmm? if they've used a WORKER RUSH it was in an old patch and using the worker stack attack bug aka allowing them to be in one big chunk and only one that kills pretty much anything in seconds. And even then they had marine or two ... Click here to view this comment.

#50. Posted on November 16, 2007 05:58 AM. scc-toss has played maybe 5 zvp's and doesn't know a shit about z, so good for you. And then again, sharpie/mustardmap are hardly decent either. Dutch isn't even CLOSE to decent either. Being decent is something to be proud of. btw kirby, you pretty much owned yourself. You have beaten a few guys who kinda/almost count, and they werent with these strategies. So how do you prove that these work? "mustardmap cannon defense vs.scv rush. then dts" do you realize that an scv rus ... Click here to view this comment.

#51. Posted on November 15, 2007 08:21 AM. akar isn't even CLOSE to decent. And he only a WEEK ago started to play competitively. also, akar is INFERIOR to you atm skill wise. Therefore, it doesn't count. Sure, I can beat you with pure zerglings and queens which wouldn't work against anyone even close to my skill... But Can I do it against BETTER players than me or even AS good? And still win with something else than a simple fluke? I think not. I really do. And kirby, the very fact is, these have worked, yes, but only against peopl ... Click here to view this comment.

#52. Posted on November 12, 2007 05:45 AM. here you go... melee: http://www.iccup.com/upload/map/ICCup%20Zodiac%20101.SCX obs: http://www.iccup.com/upload/map/obs/ICCup%20Tau%20Cross%28o%29.scx oops... sorry about that. obs map doesnt work, but the melee is there. ... Click here to view this comment.

#53. Posted on November 11, 2007 03:08 AM. giga(gigant) = ahzz btw anyway kirby, im quite done here. There's only one thing I don't understand. I explain closely everything that's wrong, everyone else except you agree with me, and you know im much better than you. Why wont you believe what you're told. I have nothing more to ask. and don't dodge that question. ... Click here to view this comment.

#54. Posted on November 10, 2007 04:34 PM. and you're the BM version of the shittiest sc gamer ever? ... Click here to view this comment.

#55. Posted on November 10, 2007 01:36 PM. ahah D go ahead post a crappy replay of me vs lammy or whatever you want. And I wouldn't really say "eating ahzz for breakfeast" lol. well, in any case, I have just as many replays of beating lammy as he has of beating me (estimation) so its kinda useless to post a single game. and whatever do you think to achieve with that? make me look worse? cuz you aren't. ... Click here to view this comment.

#56. Posted on November 08, 2007 08:55 PM. let's try it out? if I win you'll stop using and talking about these strats. deal? If you think it's not possible, why not give it a shot? ... Click here to view this comment.

#57. Posted on November 08, 2007 11:31 AM. no, not mmf... but close enough. ... Click here to view this comment.

#58. Posted on November 08, 2007 11:30 AM. i can defeat you with any strat, excluding queens and drones ... Click here to view this comment.

#59. Posted on November 08, 2007 06:20 AM. as long as you use the strategies you talk here and be stubborn, you wont beat me. If you change them and listen to people, you might have a chance. ... Click here to view this comment.

#60. Posted on November 07, 2007 05:53 AM. see guys? espcially you jello12. See what I mean by him being stubborn? I gave him an complete explanation for EVERYTHING he said in this strategy and massacred pretty much every one of them. Yet he acts like that, which was my point. And no kirby, I didnt try to sneak a single one behind your back. I knew it completely you'd still read the comments here. It's just time you'd actually realize what other people think of you and that you're damn stubborn and arrogant. You ask me advice, you say ... Click here to view this comment.

#61. Posted on November 06, 2007 07:45 AM. When you increase opponents they will seek to aid each other in troubles and therefore when you attack them, keeping one at bay is harder. The main reason, however, is this. When you park you lurkers or whatever, preventing them from attacking, expanding, and all of the book, they can't do what they want to do before moving on. They want to do this very specific thing before they start doing anything else very much, so if you keep lurkers at his choke, yea, he keeps sending units, the units d ... Click here to view this comment.

#62. Posted on November 06, 2007 07:05 AM. Team up? I never asked for any team up. Other's only agreed with me... isn't that correct? And you know, I wouldn't over react, and not so many people would respond, but kirby is simply famous for his idiotic strategies and stubborness, not to mention arrogance, that no other method would be even thinkable. Trust me, people have tried to teach him for god knows how long, but he never listens to anyone except himself. Now if it was you, jello12, we hardly would have reacted as we did. We don' ... Click here to view this comment.

#63. Posted on November 03, 2007 10:07 AM. boxer has dropped from the top 30. He REALLY dropped when he went to the Airforce... ... Click here to view this comment.

#64. Posted on November 02, 2007 03:27 PM. Exceptional. I really like this map. it has alot of potential ... Click here to view this comment.

#65. Posted on November 02, 2007 11:30 AM. if we went back a few years, yeah, he'd be like top 5 or something. But now... ... Click here to view this comment.

#66. Posted on October 31, 2007 10:32 PM. who cares about your borat lol? interview some gosu while doing it, and maybe it'll get here. ... Click here to view this comment.

#67. Posted on October 31, 2007 02:45 PM. well, carmac was just joking around lol. He did a interview with tasteless too, and mysteriously, his english was very good, he understood everything, and didnt joke around so much. ... Click here to view this comment.

#68. Posted on October 29, 2007 09:51 AM. It means savior and bisu owned. Bisu raped kwanro, and savior beat free without much trouble too. Terran's should come up next week if I remember correct. As I said, there are A, B, C and D Savior vs Free was B, bisu vs kwanro was D. next week A and C will play their matches, and I believe that after that its A vs B and C vs D. So yeah, if Savior beats winner of A, and Bisu beats winner of C, then they will be playing against each other in the grand final. That should be quite a show, as savio ... Click here to view this comment.

#69. Posted on October 24, 2007 07:36 AM. ... who really cares if its ums? ... Click here to view this comment.

#70. Posted on October 23, 2007 11:01 AM. replays from the current patch please. ... Click here to view this comment.

#71. Posted on October 22, 2007 12:57 PM. ARandomKid, guess what? For a long time I've been thinking of ways/trying to bring the average skill up within SC.org users... Thats one reason why I applied to the staff lolz. And I also knew that it would be so simple if they were only lead to the right path, and one way is to show them where to get high-leveled player replays. Easiest too. I hope others than you realize this fact as well! ... Click here to view this comment.

#72. Posted on October 21, 2007 12:07 PM. sure, for example over here http://www.iccup.com/maps.php ... Click here to view this comment.

#73. Posted on October 21, 2007 09:55 AM. ah sorry about the buggyness. I had some troubles on it, but it should be fixed now ... Click here to view this comment.

#74. Posted on October 19, 2007 01:17 AM. That's how you feel when you're talking about observers view point. However, when you play them, you get your ass raped. ... Click here to view this comment.

#75. Posted on October 16, 2007 10:58 AM. There are starcraft schools in korea, I'm not kidding. And besides, starcraft is their sport. That's all. Instead of athletes, they have starcraft pros. In fact, this one match had a bigger audience than a huge baseball match in US. (they had over 100 000 people in the audience in this boxer vs nada grand finals.) And they amount they earn? Well, atleast the top pros earn ENOUGH to say the least... ... Click here to view this comment.

#76. Posted on October 15, 2007 04:05 PM. replacement for science vessel. ... Click here to view this comment.

#77. Posted on October 15, 2007 01:07 PM. hmm? since I was challenged personally, and I knew it was easy, I really couldnt refuse. It took me two tries, this is the second one. On first one I tried a risky build though. ... Click here to view this comment.

#78. Posted on October 15, 2007 12:58 PM. I will make a newspost about it when they are released, however, they should be at world cyber games's website first. ... Click here to view this comment.

#79. Posted on October 15, 2007 08:23 AM. or you should just patch it to 1.15.1? It might not work because the computer AI or might have changed just a bit since then. Just patch it to the newest version and it'll be fine. ... Click here to view this comment.

#80. Posted on October 14, 2007 10:05 AM. broodbuddy, in fact, savior and mondi were on the same group. However, mondragon beat him over there ZvZ torrasque, yeah, tasteless did indeed commentate on WCG. The VOD's should be released soon enough too I guess. In fact, there are some already. ... Click here to view this comment.

#81. Posted on October 14, 2007 03:13 AM. replays of the event should be released soon enough. ooa ... Click here to view this comment.

#82. Posted on October 09, 2007 06:45 AM. do you know why salv said you shouldnt? because it's obvious to him that you'd get your ass raped, you'd only humilate yourself. But, enough of that. You can't prove my logic wrong, but I can prove yours. Also, remember that SC is a ten-year-old that still has a large fanbase and still has more money in progaming than any other game. If you seriously think these were good, why aren't the progamers using them? ... Click here to view this comment.

#83. Posted on October 09, 2007 05:48 AM. at that point they already have disruption way, sometimes they also get in the way, and there already is a sunken (usually) that will hold them back just as well as a spore colony. Often there isnt a spore colony too far away though, but usually it gets D-webbed too. ... Click here to view this comment.

#84. Posted on October 08, 2007 06:22 AM. haha shut up kirby. And the times I posted are not times I play, they're times I can be on if it works for you. I definately dont play SC 12 hours a day, and I definately atm don't play even 8 hours a week, so shut up and play me. I'm supposed to wait 2+++ months just because of a lame ass shit like that? if you can just make a few practise games, you'll be almost as close to your best as possible, and it's not like I'm at my best either, so stop making excuses and play me. ... Click here to view this comment.

#85. Posted on October 07, 2007 01:14 AM. no, I didnt count ums. Like 2 years ago, I had almost 3000 games in STATS in only ONE ACCOUNT, check /stats gigant.dwmt @europe. And From then I've played more games. much more. And what do you mean I'm theorycrafting? its you who is theorycrafting noob. And yes, overlords are all around the map, but they are not all around the map in early game. in early game they're all around the bases you have. in late game, which you're talking of with your arbiters and dark templars, I have overlord spe ... Click here to view this comment.

#86. Posted on October 06, 2007 03:56 PM. as a matter of fact, yes I am. Or if you have played 4000 games, you're one of the worst players I know to have played so many. Yes, sure, its easy to get overlords with two stasises, as long as he's worse than you that is. Do you realize that all I need against the computer is queens and drones? It's because im much better. Besides, even IF all overlords were stasised, so what? rest of his units will retreat instead of just dying, and after overlords come out of their freeze, they can spot y ... Click here to view this comment.

#87. Posted on October 06, 2007 02:49 PM. for the sair reaver, I never said it wouldnt work once in early game, did I? Nope. It will probably work once, at most twice when you first get your 2 reavers. You may be able to pick off an expansion and a few drones, but after that you need bigger armies if you dont want to lose em every time. you make it sound as if you should keep repeating the same process. And no, I didnt make up the using arbiters/dt's Once you've played 4000+ games competitively like me, you'll understand what I mean ... Click here to view this comment.

#88. Posted on October 05, 2007 12:34 PM. well okay, sorry about the 'mass scouts and archives' then. But read the rest of it, dont judge it for only a few lines. And you know kirby, I only cut parts when I QUOTED something. I answered the thing I quoted VERY throughly, and after that I check out if I forgot to mention anything that you said from the original text. Why I quoted to begin with was, to make it easier for people to understand, and you too, so they dont have to return back and fourth all the time. I sometimes cut stuf ... Click here to view this comment.

#89. Posted on October 05, 2007 06:58 AM. its funny how you think you're very good after you somehow beat a lame rush which definately wasnt serious or someone worse than you ... Click here to view this comment.

#90. Posted on October 05, 2007 06:49 AM. WORDS TO KIRBY: DONT COME BACK OVER HERE OR ANYWHERE TALKING ABOUT HOW GREAT YOUR STRATEGIES ARE BEFORE YOU HAVE READ ALL I HAVE SAID AND YOU CAN PROVE MINE WRONG (which you cant Okay here goes, please bear with me lol, since you are deaf to any negative feedback, lets put it the nice way, I'll tell you EXACTLY how flawed all your strategies are. you should listen to me then, yes? Yeah yeah I know, it worked against "noob125" and "hasu999" who both have 20% win ... Click here to view this comment.

#91. Posted on October 04, 2007 04:13 AM. hmm some things are slightly off, but there was alot of effort on this and it was somehow correct so here it is ~~ ... Click here to view this comment.

#92. Posted on October 04, 2007 04:12 AM. I... am speechless. Makes me wonder who accepted this lolz. Oh well, atleast there was made effort to it. ... Click here to view this comment.

#93. Posted on September 09, 2007 09:00 AM. "And 12-16 to choose of? oh my!" gay. ... Click here to view this comment.

#94. Posted on August 26, 2007 09:51 PM. ah, and also, it would be nice if you can like, use race badges beside the names on the replay, so if someone is looking for example only for ZvT's, they can find them easily. in any case, good job! also, we might want to make a specific section for the good players and progamers.. So if someone is looking for replays to really LEARN of, they know where to look ... Click here to view this comment.

#95. Posted on August 26, 2007 09:41 PM. new mods/admins for the sections are...? not decided yet I guess. hehe. ... Click here to view this comment.

#96. Posted on August 06, 2007 08:59 AM. .... sc2 story takes on about 10 years after original starcraft. that simple DUHHHH ... Click here to view this comment.

#97. Posted on August 04, 2007 04:55 AM. snipedragon, the thing is, if we get like... 80 people it means that already 16 are getting walk over for first round which mean they gotta wait for around 40 minutes before next game. and that already frustrates many newbies. And especially first tourney. MANY people will join the first one because its first ever done, to see how it works etc. IT gives the impression, and if it doesn't work well, they will just say screw you and never play in those tourneys again unless they're really bored ... Click here to view this comment.

#98. Posted on August 03, 2007 08:50 AM. AANNNNDDDD ON A NUTSHELL! WOOHOO! ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ seriously 64 is tops what we can manage somehow properly, and I think first tourney should be 32 or 64. 128 is so much easier to screw up, therefore I recommend using 64 ... Click here to view this comment.

#99. Posted on August 01, 2007 05:10 PM. theres still over one million active gamers playing SC ... Click here to view this comment.

#100. Posted on August 01, 2007 02:19 PM. yes it will be nice tourney, and it will also last about 5-7 hours. but since you're so sure, I guess you can handle it ... Click here to view this comment.

#101. Posted on August 01, 2007 12:43 PM. hmm I agree, 32 or 64 would be just fine ... Click here to view this comment.

#102. Posted on August 01, 2007 12:06 PM. the exact date is yet to be announced. ... Click here to view this comment.

#103. Posted on August 01, 2007 04:23 AM. it doesn't matter if you're rusty. its just for fun. plus those who do decent in the tournament will get a honorable mention. ... Click here to view this comment.

#104. Posted on July 29, 2007 12:57 PM. not balanced, and quite simple map too. you made the terrain VERY simple so that the symmetry would be easy to manage/copy but its not so bad otherwise ... Click here to view this comment.

#105. Posted on July 25, 2007 10:54 AM. fabulous. exceptional. ... Click here to view this comment.

#106. Posted on July 16, 2007 12:22 AM. and that is why older replays dont always work, something costs less or something, and therefore the actions gradually screw up ... Click here to view this comment.

#107. Posted on July 14, 2007 01:18 PM. nice, you did it very fast after the videos were released! ... Click here to view this comment.

#108. Posted on July 12, 2007 01:05 PM. show it to kirby ... Click here to view this comment.

#109. Posted on July 12, 2007 10:18 AM. for replays... http://sc.gosugamers.net/replays.php ... Click here to view this comment.

#110. Posted on July 12, 2007 07:44 AM. ill comment on it soon enough. it has some flaws though ... Click here to view this comment.

#111. Posted on July 12, 2007 01:20 AM. no one dares to comment on the great lammy's strategy ooa ... Click here to view this comment.

#112. Posted on July 08, 2007 04:31 AM. roffel. ... Click here to view this comment.

#113. Posted on July 07, 2007 10:29 AM. very good. ... Click here to view this comment.

#114. Posted on July 07, 2007 09:37 AM. okay I believe this is quite enough, if atomickitten learned his mistake, its all good. Now let's drop it unless he wants to continue it. Though I hope he still comes on and plays us :/ certain... things might be easier to realize then. ... Click here to view this comment.

#115. Posted on July 07, 2007 06:43 AM. shadez, AND 50 from drone, stoooopid ;p I just got the idea that atomickitten didn't even read my post very closely, even much less looked the educational replays I posted. ... Click here to view this comment.

#116. Posted on July 07, 2007 01:20 AM. "How the fuck does one micro rines and medics against lurks WHEN THEY DON'T HAVE DETECTION?" I mostly said you don't run them straight to the trap yes? besides, you get academy as you get meds/stimpack and comsat too. The most basic m&m micro even inexperienced can pull off, is that they shoot, stimpack, and run away, forcing the lurkers to unburrow again. "I go for Gols and SV's while the enemy goes for mutas and hydras, and you say I'M gas heavy? I admit, a gosu pl ... Click here to view this comment.

#117. Posted on July 06, 2007 02:30 PM. "You asked for it... The first ... 2/3's of this strategy are common sense" which most of sc.org apparently dont have. "nobody puts only 1 scv on a mineral patch, even noobs" imo it was exaggeration. what he's trying to bring out, is that you gotta make alot of them. well over 2 or maybe even 3 per mineral patch, atleast for a while. "The basic strategies are NOT set" in fact they 90% of the time are. of course you can go stuff like fast wraith or fas ... Click here to view this comment.

#118. Posted on July 02, 2007 01:17 PM. "I don't agree. I think they're overcomplicating a game that relies on simplicity as a first prioritiy -.-'' It's beautiful how the game flows so well with only 2 resource types." ... I really thought you were smart. well maybe you still are, but you aren't showing it here lol heh simply said, there are still only two resource types. its just that, yellow fields give, for example, 16 instead of 8 like normal minerals. I thought that much was obvious. ... Click here to view this comment.

#119. Posted on June 28, 2007 12:45 AM. heh. YESSS YESSS YESSSS! Finally that shit was confirmed! Heroes do not fit to starcraft multiplayer. ... Click here to view this comment.

#120. Posted on June 14, 2007 05:48 AM. ....a it said it was for "money maps" to me. very weird. That's kinda the reason I finally let this through Otherwise I might've let it through earlier, but they building timings are heavily off. that is not the fastest way over there. Just as a fast example, the first pylon should be built 8/9 This way you wont have to stop probe production at any moment, which is very important in early stages of the game. It also speeds things up later on. Also, fast zealot rushes vs terr ... Click here to view this comment.

#121. Posted on June 10, 2007 09:45 AM. "Oh and BTW, Ahzz, did you also get to find out what the blind guy's name was?" Lee Min Seok ... Click here to view this comment.

#122. Posted on June 10, 2007 07:25 AM. well. boxer didn't break the rules, and I'd feel bad kinda if I lost because he wasn't trying. he did his best, and won. That's it. Boxer probably went and congratulated him afterwards... and probably many did. ... Click here to view this comment.

#123. Posted on June 09, 2007 05:22 PM. "I thought it was something else when the blind guy knew where all the expansions were at when he was scouting!! So staged..." please? show respect to the blind guys sheer skill. it is 100% real... it is korea, anything related to starcraft can happen. "The blind guy just memorized the map" you make it sound so simple. haha. ofcourse he knows the map, I know all common maps too. I mean, just try to beat a normal computer while blindfolded? too hard to even make y ... Click here to view this comment.

#124. Posted on June 09, 2007 05:19 AM. Ah I just heard that it was in the rules that boxer gotta be blindfolded for 3 minutes. he can then remove it. ... Click here to view this comment.

#125. Posted on June 09, 2007 01:24 AM. dutch, can you see how much trouble boxer had even to add his scvs mining? he wasn't used to that stuff lol. if he hadn't done it it would have been quite pathetic loss for the opponents fast ling rush. and he still almost lost. ... Click here to view this comment.

#126. Posted on June 08, 2007 03:33 PM. because they might want first person video out of. kind of see it in boxers perspective. not possible if monitor is off. ... Click here to view this comment.

#127. Posted on June 07, 2007 12:58 PM. yeah tomahawk. the shape is kinda weird, it doesn't really look "3D" as it could, kinda lacks a details, and its coloring is not the same quality as in BW. I know the same quality is hard to reach, but you should try. ... Click here to view this comment.

#128. Posted on June 07, 2007 02:16 AM. hmm... the terran new flyer ship... can't remember its name, but right now it looks like a dam joke. I mean no offense or anything, but if they see screenshots of that, I mean some better players too, they might be turned away. the zerg bane looks nice from what I've seen tho. ... Click here to view this comment.

#129. Posted on June 04, 2007 11:57 PM. nothing, maybe, but the new one will look better and it'll have some features the previous one didnt. ... Click here to view this comment.

#130. Posted on May 24, 2007 11:55 AM. actually, in good hands zerg > all rest in original. Besides, you can order it to philippines gallantry. ... Click here to view this comment.

#131. Posted on May 23, 2007 12:16 PM. I'm not sure if its true or not, but it might be that they're taking in progamers to try it out. Though those current top pros probably wont come to it as their career is going on and they got big tournaments up and all that. ... Click here to view this comment.

#132. Posted on May 21, 2007 12:08 PM. more like your connection, not your comp. But I assure you, it's worth it. The IGN and youtube videos are not even comparable to this, this really gives 10x better idea about the game ... Click here to view this comment.

#133. Posted on May 20, 2007 12:39 PM. some maps and fiction etc have not been submitted yet, and some might've been dissaproved and not submitted at all on purpose I didn't allow most of the strategies piled up during this time in. That's because of the contents quality. ... Click here to view this comment.

#134. Posted on May 20, 2007 12:18 PM. "so that by the time StarCraft II hits the shelves we'll all be climbing over each other to get it. " I wont, I'm preordering it. Hah. ... Click here to view this comment.

#135. Posted on May 20, 2007 10:14 AM. the gameplay movie was already supposed to come out, but they changed it to "coming soon" ... Can't know exact reason for it, but might be they're making changes?! ... Click here to view this comment.

#136. Posted on May 20, 2007 01:35 AM. yes, now we can start submitting all those submissions that have been piled up meanwhile ... Click here to view this comment.

#137. Posted on May 11, 2007 09:36 AM. http://www.broodwarai.com/forums/index.php?act=attach&type=post&id=22 Try that one. It's my AI. It works the same as This Racine, except that you can play it on any map. Try some other matchups than TvZ too. Simply start the AI, pick any map, any matchup and play. It works on battle.net with friends too. ... Click here to view this comment.

#138. Posted on May 10, 2007 12:38 PM. "Since I doubt that SC2 is coming out, it must be a completely new genre. Blizzard may be announcing this new genre in South Korea simply because it 'sells'." hah. Blizzard has confirmed it's not MMO, it's not sc:ghost, its not wow expansion. It's announced in south korea. What choice is there? I can imagine some 12 year old kid shooting the staff if its not atleast starcraft related. ... Click here to view this comment.

#139. Posted on May 10, 2007 12:27 PM. umm.. Many matchups vary... Besides, racine has made new, better versions and there are several other AI's that are very good too. I've made some pretty good AI's myself ... Click here to view this comment.

#140. Posted on May 08, 2007 11:30 PM. not me. I beat all three of them. ... Click here to view this comment.

#141. Posted on May 05, 2007 02:28 PM. ""...... And you think we'd let all SC.org users even GET their replays to the section? No... it's only best of the best" Well I pretty much aint gonna get a replay on this site. Oh well. Least I can watch them at home." -Hmm, well that might be true, as I would atleast prefer there to be mainly replays that people can learn a thing or two about. I don't want to offend anyone, but this site's general skill level is at the point that most don't even know the correct buil ... Click here to view this comment.

#142. Posted on May 04, 2007 05:43 AM. I once tried to make a mac os version of a AI, but in the end it just turned out bad. It wouldn't work even though the mac os guy used programs that should somehow allow it. It was either lack of skill of the user, or it's simply impossible no no dutch, I'm not pointing at you... I'm not saying it's only you, I'm only staring at you accusingly. ... Click here to view this comment.

#143. Posted on May 01, 2007 11:24 PM. rule number one kids, rule number one... "Rule number one: Never uninstall or remove sc or even throw the cd's away, as you'll just install it again or buy a new cd" ... Click here to view this comment.

#144. Posted on May 01, 2007 06:48 AM. "Well, replays are.. kinda hard to check for quality." ...... And you think we'd let all SC.org users even GET their replays to the section? No... it's only best of the best. ... Click here to view this comment.

#145. Posted on April 29, 2007 12:59 PM. hahahaha... that's hardly pro... if you wanna see pro and REAL good players, go to: http://sc.gosugamers.net/replays.php and download replays. Yeah tho... I guess submitting them is easy, but downloading stuff from such a simple place is not very pleasant in a way... ...SC.org should really get it's own replay section in my opinion ... Click here to view this comment.

#146. Posted on April 27, 2007 04:30 AM. sweet... and they told us sometime ago they'd like to visit starcraft world, other than ghost, before it becomes a decade old. well, heh, it's soon coming to that ... Click here to view this comment.

#147. Posted on April 24, 2007 12:49 PM. yah, this applies quite strongly for strategies too. However, the site seems to not be working as it should at the moment, so please bear with me a while will ya, I'll make up to it once it works again, so feel free to submit more strategies ... Click here to view this comment.

#148. Posted on April 24, 2007 12:47 PM. it's not heard a million times over here. And it still works, its just not commonly used since most seem to want a superior economy fast. This strategy has it's risks, but by no means was posting it useless. IT explains everything much better than most strategies here do, and its a build order sometimes used by progamers (before it was used more, but like I said, people tend to want good economy fast these days). Overall, good, but if we think of the strategies in general over here, its worth ex ... Click here to view this comment.

#149. Posted on April 24, 2007 12:43 PM. unique idea and might knock more sense to some future strategies, nice. ... Click here to view this comment.

#150. Posted on April 24, 2007 12:40 PM. nukes as itself are a joke, but there are few rare cases when they can be used as a harass especially if its kinda a draw situation. This strategy explains rather well how to use the nukes and all IF that time comes (it will be TvT, which is every 1/50 games, and in other games every 1/500 games. No no, don't start telling me how you pwned your friend zerg with nukes 10 games a row yesterday or anything, I'm talking about known good top players of the world) ... Click here to view this comment.

#151. Posted on April 24, 2007 12:38 PM. "I disagree with the confidence part. I enjoy beating overconfident players, because often it's all fake." mm thats true. I have sometimes acted arrogant myself at b.net when I know someone is worse than me. Then we've played and I've been really nervous and playing it oversafe and really worrying about stuff and I can't play as relaxed as I could. That's why I often spent too many minerals on defense I didn't really need. It's not like I lost those games, but I certainly didn't pl ... Click here to view this comment.

#152. Posted on April 24, 2007 12:35 PM. I was kinda "to accept or not to accept" with this one... It covers three gate well, yes that I agree on. And it kinda well explains what to do with it too. That's why I accepted it. However! if you do three gate, and the opponent terran decides to do crap like 2 factories and siege mode, along with a wall, there's almost nothing you can do. if he decides to do fast vultures with mines they can do heavy damage since you might not even get out of your natural before you have obs, whic ... Click here to view this comment.

#153. Posted on April 24, 2007 12:31 PM. the four barracks does work somehow like that, but the buildorder is often done another way. Besides, people almost never do 4 barracks, its mainly 3 barracks with +1 weapons or armor and that crap. Though I guess that's possible too and it can be succesful if you have a bit of a luck ... Click here to view this comment.

#154. Posted on March 25, 2007 12:42 PM. "basic stuff = good reference and guideline advanced stuff = hard to make unless you concentrate on specific things" Hardly. If it reads easy it means that its easy to pull off, and also kinda noobie strat. if its advanced it covers alot more points and you will take alot of time to perfect it, you might even not be able to perfect it at all, some strategies are like that. Even the best of the world have not perfected strategies since you could always have controlled units better ... Click here to view this comment.

#155. Posted on March 25, 2007 12:38 PM. egg trick works since rines wont do any damage to the eggs, and if you make two hydras morph to lurkers on a place such as a ramp they cant get through and you have time to get reinforcements, and your lurkers might be enough to kill them too once they finish ... Click here to view this comment.

#156. Posted on March 25, 2007 12:35 PM. it looks completely terran weapon with some weird designing. None of the protoss have guns like terrans do, they either have some sort of laser melee weapons/sabres or big cannons. Except for air units. Psi is otherwise to deal damage. HOWEVER, you might make this weapon work with psi, limited shots in a way, kind of like a medic. That would be rather good actually imo. Though you still need to modify the weapon a bit. The weapon itself isn't protoss at all, it should more like be the zealot ... Click here to view this comment.

#157. Posted on March 25, 2007 12:30 PM. wasn't research the reason they couldn't wound the zerg. So that makes it the scapegoat. Ofcourse people might think it was arcturus mengsk, as he didnt put much effort in saving his lietunant. However, the zerg attack was completely unexpected. It also was kerrigans fault, because she decided to go there even though she had a some sort of choise ... Click here to view this comment.

#158. Posted on March 24, 2007 08:40 AM. Insane? in what manner? Ok I admit I couldn't solve it just like that pang, but after I put them to the paper and drew lines what goes to what and thought about the facts they come up one at the time. ... Click here to view this comment.

#159. Posted on March 24, 2007 02:26 AM. matty solved them all. Did he have to? I solved one. I didn't know I had'to do all. did I have to? ... Click here to view this comment.

#160. Posted on March 22, 2007 10:28 PM. hey it looks like sabakzaattack actually knows something! (I mean no offense by that, serious.) Let's play sometime, I wanna see your skill ... Click here to view this comment.

#161. Posted on March 22, 2007 01:02 PM. yeah if starcraft is being talked about even in korean comics then it means something. Maybe your instructor hasn't been in korea for a while... ... Click here to view this comment.

#162. Posted on March 21, 2007 09:02 AM. so some question of stuff suggested already earlier: Is a competetitive strategy section possible? Would it be possible for the staff to sticky/unsticky very good strategies so that people would see those easily even later on. could the Staff delete old strategies that really aren't the ... right sort of material to improve anyone or anything? Ofcourse, if we add competetitive section this isn't as needed as it would be. Nice that you finished with this now :] glad to be part of this tea ... Click here to view this comment.

#163. Posted on March 10, 2007 10:35 AM. "we should be able to move forward shortly." ;P meaning what? move forward to where nah, you don't need to answer me. It's not like I'm in a huge hurry anyway. ... Click here to view this comment.

#164. Posted on March 02, 2007 01:12 PM. yes this is nice, but most over here will get pwned 100-0 when they try it. ... Click here to view this comment.

#165. Posted on March 02, 2007 11:52 AM. useless strategies aren't being posted, well dunno if the strats are considered useless by the current staff, but don't hurry with it... I mean I've waited a while too now, and will still wait to hear who was chosen. Though if me and lammy are chosen we'll seriously clean the strategies section and be alot more strict. As well as submit basic strategies with the right stuff and all. ... Click here to view this comment.

#166. Posted on February 16, 2007 02:44 PM. yeah well, we just gotta know now when they announce it. guess they gotta do quite a bit of programming or something if they want strat mods have power ONLY in strat depot etc ... Click here to view this comment.

#167. Posted on February 11, 2007 02:49 AM. hehe. Both me and lammas signed up for strat mods. Both of us are very experienced and good starcraft players, and we also wont let just any strats through. As long as we're both picked, we'll do our best to improve it and make it really worth checking out for almost everyone. but, it is, if we're picked. It's all of the mods decisions :] ... Click here to view this comment.

#168. Posted on February 04, 2007 05:51 AM. so when will the rest of the applicants be announced ... Click here to view this comment.

#169. Posted on January 27, 2007 12:51 PM. not been informed yet if I got strategy position, though I hope you guys took the pro replay section that I suggested to serious consideration too... ... Click here to view this comment.

#170. Posted on January 26, 2007 08:02 AM. well aren't you quite the cool kid, I mean flagged and all. I got flagged. ... Click here to view this comment.

#171. Posted on January 21, 2007 02:21 AM. I applied for strategy, news, and another section I suggested that would be very important for learning. Though I also added a note that I won't take any of these jobs (except maybe the new section I suggested) unless I get strategy position, and I won't take strategy position if some random noob over here wants one too. I don't wanna start fighting wether a strat belonged to that section or no. ... Click here to view this comment.

#172. Posted on January 20, 2007 05:03 AM. Do you want to know what "decent" means in starcraft? about 3000 games of experience. ... Click here to view this comment.